• Home
  • About
  • Issues
    • Column 1
      • Energy
      • Healthcare
      • Taxes & Spending
      • Technology
      • Consumer Safety
    • Column 2
      • Agriculture
      • Trade
      • Government Regulation
      • Banking & Investmets
      • Intellectual Property
    • Column 3
      • Property Rights
      • Legal Reform
      • Higher Education
      • Right To Work
      • Retail & Online Commerce
  • Newsroom
  • Contact
info@caseforconsumers.org
Case for ConsumersCase for Consumers
Case for ConsumersCase for Consumers
  • Home
  • About
  • Issues
    • Column 1
      • Energy
      • Healthcare
      • Taxes & Spending
      • Technology
      • Consumer Safety
    • Column 2
      • Agriculture
      • Trade
      • Government Regulation
      • Banking & Investmets
      • Intellectual Property
    • Column 3
      • Property Rights
      • Legal Reform
      • Higher Education
      • Right To Work
      • Retail & Online Commerce
  • Newsroom
  • Contact

SC Gov. McMaster Champions Nuclear Tax Credits to Secure America’s Energy Future

SC Gov. McMaster Champions Nuclear Tax Credits to Secure America’s Energy Future

SC Gov. McMaster Champions Nuclear Tax Credits to Secure America’s Energy Future

May 12, 2025 Energy

In a powerful statement of support for American energy independence and President Trump’s energy agenda, South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster is leading a critical effort to preserve federal tax incentives for nuclear energy development.

The South Carolina governor delivered a compelling letter to the state’s congressional delegation urging the protection of vital nuclear tax credits and loan programs that are essential for completing the V.C. Summer nuclear project and advancing nuclear power nationwide.

A Strategic Energy Imperative

As America faces unprecedented energy demand growth, Gov. McMaster recognizes that nuclear power must play a central role in achieving true energy security. His letter specifically calls for preserving crucial federal tax credits for existing nuclear power.

“South Carolina is about to lose an historic opportunity we’ve been seeking for years and working towards for months: ushering in a nuclear renaissance in South Carolina and across the country,” writes Gov. McMaster. “The country needs power. We’ve been meeting and planning vigorously for months with people and companies who want to build nuclear reactors and who want to buy their power.”

The governor’s urgent appeal comes at a critical juncture as Congress considers eliminating these incentives through budget reconciliation, which would effectively halt the revival of the V.C. Summer project.

Market-Based Solutions for Energy Security

While critics have consistently opposed government subsidies for unproven technologies, nuclear energy represents a compelling case. Unlike intermittent power sources, nuclear provides reliable baseload generation that can power American homes and businesses continuously, regardless of weather conditions.

The tax incentives championed by Gov. McMaster have successfully leveraged private capital for nuclear development at a scale that benefits consumers through enhanced grid reliability and long-term price stability. As the governor emphasizes, these programs “help attract billions of dollars in large-scale private capital and investment necessary for nuclear construction” when “traditional lenders are reluctant to finance new nuclear generation projects.”

Protecting Consumer Investments

The governor’s letter highlights that S. 51, legislation he will soon sign, specifically identifies these federal tax credits and loan programs as critical to completing construction of the V.C. Summer reactors. Without these incentives, private investment becomes virtually impossible, threatening South Carolina’s energy future.

An abrupt elimination of these provisions would not only jeopardize the V.C. Summer project but could raise energy costs for American consumers by reducing future supply and increasing our dependence on less reliable energy sources.

Looking Forward

“South Carolina’s economy is booming, and our population is growing at record rates,” Gov. McMaster notes. “Our prosperity has created demand for infrastructure, workforce, housing, education, transportation, and recreation. All these challenges – now and in the future – require South Carolina to have clean, abundant and affordable power. That means nuclear power. And that means finishing the job at V.C. Summer.”

CASE applauds Gov. McMaster for advocating in support of reliable, affordable energy for American consumers. By preserving strategic investments in nuclear energy, lawmakers can ensure America maintains its competitive edge while keeping prices manageable for families and businesses.

The governor’s leadership exemplifies how targeted tax policies can unlock private investment in critical infrastructure, creating a stronger energy future for South Carolina and the nation as a whole.

Tags: nuclear energy
Share
0

You also might be interested in

CASE Op-Ed – Columbus Dispatch: Abundance of Shale Makes Nuclear Plants Expendable

CASE Op-Ed – Columbus Dispatch: Abundance of Shale Makes Nuclear Plants Expendable

Jul 16, 2019

  Matthew Kandrach – President, CASE July 16,2019 It’s time[...]

Victory for American Energy: Rep. Newhouse’s Leadership Secures Nuclear Tax Credits in Trump’s Big, Beautiful Bill

Victory for American Energy: Rep. Newhouse’s Leadership Secures Nuclear Tax Credits in Trump’s Big, Beautiful Bill

Jun 2, 2025

Representative Dan Newhouse (R-WA) has delivered a major victory for[...]

CASE Op-Ed – Harrisburg Sun: It’s time to Modernize America’s Coal Fleet

CASE Op-Ed – Harrisburg Sun: It’s time to Modernize America’s Coal Fleet

May 2, 2018

MATTHEW KANDRACH – PRESIDENT, CASE May 2, 2018 – https://bit.ly/2HHgWdb Anyone[...]

Search

Categories

  • Aegis
  • Agriculture
  • Commerce
  • Communications
  • Consumer Safety
  • Data Privacy
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Energy
  • Entertainment
  • Environment
  • Financial Services
  • Fiscal Policy
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Ed on the Hill
  • Housing
  • Intellectual Property
  • Kentucky
  • Labor
  • Legal
  • Lifestyle
  • Manufacturing
  • Media
  • Regulation
  • Retail
  • Robotexts
  • Taxes
  • TCPA
  • Technology
  • Ticketmaster
  • Trade
  • Transportation
  • Uncategorized
  • Veterans

Archives

Contact Us

CASE Follow

Consumer Action for a Strong Economy - the Free Market Voice for America's Consumers; likes=bookmarks

CASE_forAmerica
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
23 Oct

.@POTUS’ IRA is driving up Part D premiums for millions of Medicare beneficiaries, yet Dems like @SenSanders continue to help tout this disastrous legislation. The Biden-Harris @WhiteHouse is misleading the public on their policy’s real impact.

Reply on Twitter 1849183731690409996 Retweet on Twitter 1849183731690409996 5 Like on Twitter 1849183731690409996 4 Twitter 1849183731690409996
Retweet on Twitter CASE Retweeted
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
23 Oct

Two weeks from election day, the supposedly independent @FCC is proposing price regulation of #broadband by restricting what data plans companies can offer.

By prohibiting usage-based plans, the FCC would end up increasing prices FOR EVERYONE, including low-data users!

Reply on Twitter 1849132991164874848 Retweet on Twitter 1849132991164874848 6 Like on Twitter 1849132991164874848 2 Twitter 1849132991164874848
Retweet on Twitter CASE Retweeted
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
21 Oct

CASE Letter Urges FDA & FTC to Scrutinize Deal Between L’Oréal and Galderma -- "Both companies are currently under investigation or facing sizable lawsuits from claims that they have used harmful chemicals in their products."
https://caseforconsumers.org/2024/10/21/case-letter-urges-fda-ftc-to-scrutinize-deal-between-loreal-and-galderma/

Reply on Twitter 1848386046033010802 Retweet on Twitter 1848386046033010802 4 Like on Twitter 1848386046033010802 2 Twitter 1848386046033010802
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
23 Oct

Two weeks from election day, the supposedly independent @FCC is proposing price regulation of #broadband by restricting what data plans companies can offer.

By prohibiting usage-based plans, the FCC would end up increasing prices FOR EVERYONE, including low-data users!

Reply on Twitter 1849132991164874848 Retweet on Twitter 1849132991164874848 6 Like on Twitter 1849132991164874848 2 Twitter 1849132991164874848
Load More

Contact us for more information!

Send us an email so that we can get back to you, as soon as possible.

Send Message
Find out more about consumer issues View Issues

Find us here

  • Case for Consumers
  • 1800 Diagonal Road, Suite 600 Alexandria, VA 22314
  • 703-718-5011
  • info@caseforconsumers.org
  • caseforconsumers.org

Fresh from our blog

  • CASE Op-Ed in RealClearPolicy: Foreign Patent Trolls Wreak Havoc at the ITC
  • Victory for American Energy: Rep. Newhouse’s Leadership Secures Nuclear Tax Credits in Trump’s Big, Beautiful Bill
  • Sen. Tillis Bill Will End the Trial Lawyer Gravy Train
  • CASE Op-Ed in American Thinker: Crypto Kiosks Unfairly Singled Out By Lawmakers

© 2025 · Case for Consumers

  • Home
  • About
  • Issues
  • Contact
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms & Condition
Prev Next