• Home
  • About
  • Issues
    • Column 1
      • Energy
      • Healthcare
      • Taxes & Spending
      • Technology
      • Consumer Safety
    • Column 2
      • Agriculture
      • Trade
      • Government Regulation
      • Banking & Investmets
      • Intellectual Property
    • Column 3
      • Property Rights
      • Legal Reform
      • Higher Education
      • Right To Work
      • Retail & Online Commerce
  • Newsroom
  • Contact
info@caseforconsumers.org
Case for ConsumersCase for Consumers
Case for ConsumersCase for Consumers
  • Home
  • About
  • Issues
    • Column 1
      • Energy
      • Healthcare
      • Taxes & Spending
      • Technology
      • Consumer Safety
    • Column 2
      • Agriculture
      • Trade
      • Government Regulation
      • Banking & Investmets
      • Intellectual Property
    • Column 3
      • Property Rights
      • Legal Reform
      • Higher Education
      • Right To Work
      • Retail & Online Commerce
  • Newsroom
  • Contact

Price Controls—The Taxes You Don’t Know About

Price Controls—The Taxes You Don’t Know About

Price Controls—The Taxes You Don’t Know About

May 24, 2021 Healthcare

May 24, 2021

Right now, the Biden administration is in the middle of selling its $2 trillion-plus infrastructure package, $1.8 trillion American Families Plan and a historically high 2022 federal budget to legislators. To pass many of these measures through a split Senate, Democrats are relying on the reconciliation process, which requires offsetting costs to avoid a filibuster. And while the President routinely touts that those making under $400,000 per year are safe from tax hikes, what he hopes you do not know is that taxes are not just confined to income levels and tax brackets. That money will come from somewhere, just not where you might think.

Currently lawmakers are looking to offset costs by overhauling Medicare. H.R. 3, Democrats’ signature healthcare legislation that failed to pass Congress last year but has no been recently reintroduced, would cap drug prices based on the average price paid by socialized countries abroad, while giving the HHS Secretary the power to leverage the federal government’s purchasing power to force concessions from pharmaceutical manufacturers. Not only does this legislation showcase a gross misunderstanding of America’s healthcare system, but it threatens to leave millions of vulnerable seniors out to dry.

In ways that are enormously beneficial to consumers, our free market system encourages competition that drives innovation and allows patients to access the drugs they need. By capping prices and punishing companies that don’t comply, profit motive evaporates, companies can no longer recoup investment costs and our world-leading supply of cutting-edge and lifesaving drugs dries up.

Bottom line? The government wants you to pay a health tax. Save costs now, but sacrifice your health—and that of future generations—down the road.

Vulnerable populations will be hurt the worst. Rare and chronic conditions require specialized treatments that can be more expensive. But under H.R. 3, the government would be given the power to reject more expensive drugs, kicking at-risk patients to the curb to control costs. Further, cost control measures would also reduce the quantity of available drugs. This means even longer lines for treatment and difficulty accessing potentially life-sustaining medicines.And that is before taking into account what would happen to patients who rely on a variety of options to treat similar conditions due to allergies, affordability and effectiveness.

According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, nearly 40 fewer cures would come to market over the next 20 years under H.R. 3. These could be next-generation breakthroughs for Alzheimers, Parkinsons or cancer—we have no way of knowing. It might not seem like it now, but attacking private innovators and inserting the government into the market now will mean we all pay the price later.

So where do we go from here? Lawmakers can start by not lumping serious healthcare issues under the umbrella of “infrastructure” or other unrelated spending packages. Next, we can look at solutions that will lower prices while delivering real savings to patients instead of forcing them to sacrifice access to the best healthcare system in the world. This means cutting unnecessary red tape, promoting transparency, supporting private sector innovators and reigning in middlemen so patients can realize more savings at the pharmacy counter.When the COVID-19 pandemic hit unexpectedly hard and fast last year, the government was forced to respond by pivoting to quickly implement these exact solutions. And they worked. Breakthrough vaccines reached patients more quickly than any other time in human history.

More transparency, less bureaucracy, a strong private sector and direct, streamlined savings are always effective and proven to benefit patients. We need only look at Europe to see why the anti-patient, anti-free market H.R. 3 legislation on the table right now would be anything but. Lawmakers must avoid dangerous price controls at all costs. After all, price controls are just taxes on your health—taxes that hit the most vulnerable the hardest.

Tags: American Families PlanCBOH.R. 3HHSprice controls
Share
0

You also might be interested in

CASE Issues Statement & Letter to Senate on Danger of Democrats’ Latest Drug Pricing Plan

CASE Issues Statement & Letter to Senate on Danger of Democrats’ Latest Drug Pricing Plan

Jul 21, 2022

  July 21, 2022 Today, Gerard Scimeca, Chairman of Consumer[...]

CASE Statement Opposing Washington’s Dangerous Attempt at Enacting Price Controls on Prescription Drugs

CASE Statement Opposing Washington’s Dangerous Attempt at Enacting Price Controls on Prescription Drugs

Nov 5, 2021

  November 5, 2021 Leaders on Capitol Hill are making[...]

CASE Op-Ed – Morning Consult: COVID-19 Provides a Roadmap for Effective Health Care Policy

CASE Op-Ed – Morning Consult: COVID-19 Provides a Roadmap for Effective Health Care Policy

Apr 16, 2021

Matthew Kandrach – President, CASE April 16, 2012 In a[...]

Search

Categories

  • Aegis
  • Agriculture
  • Commerce
  • Communications
  • Consumer Safety
  • Data Privacy
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Energy
  • Entertainment
  • Environment
  • Financial Services
  • Fiscal Policy
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Ed on the Hill
  • Housing
  • Intellectual Property
  • Kentucky
  • Labor
  • Legal
  • Lifestyle
  • Manufacturing
  • Media
  • Regulation
  • Retail
  • Robotexts
  • Taxes
  • TCPA
  • Technology
  • Ticketmaster
  • Trade
  • Transportation
  • Uncategorized
  • Veterans

Archives

Contact Us

CASE Follow

Consumer Action for a Strong Economy - the Free Market Voice for America's Consumers; likes=bookmarks

CASE_forAmerica
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
23 Oct

.@POTUS’ IRA is driving up Part D premiums for millions of Medicare beneficiaries, yet Dems like @SenSanders continue to help tout this disastrous legislation. The Biden-Harris @WhiteHouse is misleading the public on their policy’s real impact.

Reply on Twitter 1849183731690409996 Retweet on Twitter 1849183731690409996 5 Like on Twitter 1849183731690409996 4 Twitter 1849183731690409996
Retweet on Twitter CASE Retweeted
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
23 Oct

Two weeks from election day, the supposedly independent @FCC is proposing price regulation of #broadband by restricting what data plans companies can offer.

By prohibiting usage-based plans, the FCC would end up increasing prices FOR EVERYONE, including low-data users!

Reply on Twitter 1849132991164874848 Retweet on Twitter 1849132991164874848 6 Like on Twitter 1849132991164874848 2 Twitter 1849132991164874848
Retweet on Twitter CASE Retweeted
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
21 Oct

CASE Letter Urges FDA & FTC to Scrutinize Deal Between L’Oréal and Galderma -- "Both companies are currently under investigation or facing sizable lawsuits from claims that they have used harmful chemicals in their products."
https://caseforconsumers.org/2024/10/21/case-letter-urges-fda-ftc-to-scrutinize-deal-between-loreal-and-galderma/

Reply on Twitter 1848386046033010802 Retweet on Twitter 1848386046033010802 4 Like on Twitter 1848386046033010802 2 Twitter 1848386046033010802
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
23 Oct

Two weeks from election day, the supposedly independent @FCC is proposing price regulation of #broadband by restricting what data plans companies can offer.

By prohibiting usage-based plans, the FCC would end up increasing prices FOR EVERYONE, including low-data users!

Reply on Twitter 1849132991164874848 Retweet on Twitter 1849132991164874848 6 Like on Twitter 1849132991164874848 2 Twitter 1849132991164874848
Load More

Contact us for more information!

Send us an email so that we can get back to you, as soon as possible.

Send Message
Find out more about consumer issues View Issues

Find us here

  • Case for Consumers
  • 1800 Diagonal Road, Suite 600 Alexandria, VA 22314
  • 703-718-5011
  • info@caseforconsumers.org
  • caseforconsumers.org

Fresh from our blog

  • CASE Op-Ed in RealClearPolicy: Foreign Patent Trolls Wreak Havoc at the ITC
  • Victory for American Energy: Rep. Newhouse’s Leadership Secures Nuclear Tax Credits in Trump’s Big, Beautiful Bill
  • Sen. Tillis Bill Will End the Trial Lawyer Gravy Train
  • CASE Op-Ed in American Thinker: Crypto Kiosks Unfairly Singled Out By Lawmakers

© 2025 · Case for Consumers

  • Home
  • About
  • Issues
  • Contact
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms & Condition
Prev Next