• Home
  • About
  • Issues
    • Column 1
      • Energy
      • Healthcare
      • Taxes & Spending
      • Technology
      • Consumer Safety
    • Column 2
      • Agriculture
      • Trade
      • Government Regulation
      • Banking & Investmets
      • Intellectual Property
    • Column 3
      • Property Rights
      • Legal Reform
      • Higher Education
      • Right To Work
      • Retail & Online Commerce
  • Newsroom
  • Contact
info@caseforconsumers.org
Case for ConsumersCase for Consumers
Case for ConsumersCase for Consumers
  • Home
  • About
  • Issues
    • Column 1
      • Energy
      • Healthcare
      • Taxes & Spending
      • Technology
      • Consumer Safety
    • Column 2
      • Agriculture
      • Trade
      • Government Regulation
      • Banking & Investmets
      • Intellectual Property
    • Column 3
      • Property Rights
      • Legal Reform
      • Higher Education
      • Right To Work
      • Retail & Online Commerce
  • Newsroom
  • Contact

PBMs Get Aggressive to Keep Their Drug Profits Secret from Consumers

PBMs Get Aggressive to Keep Their Drug Profits Secret from Consumers

PBMs Get Aggressive to Keep Their Drug Profits Secret from Consumers

April 3, 2018 Healthcare

If the makers of Coke or KFC’s famous fried chicken ever fear for keeping their recipes private and confidential, they should turn to Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs) for the latest and most aggressive methods for preserving secrecy.

PBMs, as CASE has covered extensively, are healthcare middle-men wedged between plan managers, drug manufacturers, patients and pharmacies with the power to negotiate drug prices for patients. CASE has previously highlighted that PBMs—which negotiate directly with drug manufacturers and pharmacies—too often keep their contracts secret, leaving everyone in the dark over their business practices.

Now a new report in Axios reveals just how shrouded in privacy PBMs really are. After Axios obtained a 36 page contract template from Express Scripts—the nation’s largest PBM, and 22nd largest company in the nation—that lifted the curtain on how PBMs negotiate contracts, Express Scripts forced the cloud company hosting the document to take it down.

According to Axios:

  • “Express Scripts dismissed the document as out of date and irrelevant.
  • But after our story ran, the company’s lawyers forced DocumentCloud to remove the contract template, claiming copyright infringement.”

But what are they so afraid of?

It seems like the media – and now the public – is catching on to the PBM-scheme: They negotiate discounts with drug manufacturers; but instead of passing those savings onto the consumers they’re intended for, they keep those discounts to pad their profits.

What’s clear as day is that PBMs operate in the dark. And when even a crack of light threatens to expose their process – as Axios did this week –they are ready to attack. At least PBMs are consistent. Just as their contracts deny pharmacists the right to inform patients of lower cost drug options, they deny the public the least bit of transparency on their financial dealings. Their business model is to monopolize a niche portion of the pharmaceutical pipeline—just three PBMs control more than 75 percent of the market—and to refuse access to any information that could lead to real accountability or lower prices for consumers.

This is even concerning given that PBMs are now joining forces with insurers, accelerating consolidation within the healthcare industry that reduces what little competition still exists. American consumers must hear LOUD AND CLEAR that reform of PBM’s shady business practices is necessary for drug prices to decrease and level the playing field. It’s time for serious free-market principles to transform the PBM market in a way that reintroduces competition and consumer choice back into the prescription drug supply chain.

Tags: AxiosconsolidationPBMsPrescription Drugssecrecy
Share
0

You also might be interested in

Importing Pharmaceuticals: A Prescription For Disaster

Importing Pharmaceuticals: A Prescription For Disaster

Jun 20, 2019

  June 20, 2019 Across the country and in Washington,[...]

CASE Statement Opposing President’s Order Embracing Pricing Index & Foreign Importation of Medications

CASE Statement Opposing President’s Order Embracing Pricing Index & Foreign Importation of Medications

Jul 24, 2020

  Gerard Scimeca – Chairman, CASE July 24, 2020 As[...]

HUGE Mistake: White House MFN Drug Policy Will Devastate Innovation into New Treatments and Cures

HUGE Mistake: White House MFN Drug Policy Will Devastate Innovation into New Treatments and Cures

Nov 20, 2020

  November 20, 2020 As a leading advocate for consumers[...]

Search

Categories

  • Aegis
  • Agriculture
  • Commerce
  • Communications
  • Consumer Safety
  • Crime
  • Data Privacy
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Energy
  • Entertainment
  • Environment
  • Financial Services
  • Fiscal Policy
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Ed on the Hill
  • Housing
  • Intellectual Property
  • Kentucky
  • Labor
  • Legal
  • Lifestyle
  • Manufacturing
  • Media
  • Regulation
  • Retail
  • Robotexts
  • Taxes
  • TCPA
  • Technology
  • Ticketmaster
  • Trade
  • Transportation
  • Uncategorized
  • Veterans

Archives

Contact Us

CASE Follow

Consumer Action for a Strong Economy - the Free Market Voice for America's Consumers; likes=bookmarks

CASE_forAmerica
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
23 Oct

.@POTUS’ IRA is driving up Part D premiums for millions of Medicare beneficiaries, yet Dems like @SenSanders continue to help tout this disastrous legislation. The Biden-Harris @WhiteHouse is misleading the public on their policy’s real impact.

Reply on Twitter 1849183731690409996 Retweet on Twitter 1849183731690409996 5 Like on Twitter 1849183731690409996 4 Twitter 1849183731690409996
Retweet on Twitter CASE Retweeted
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
23 Oct

Two weeks from election day, the supposedly independent @FCC is proposing price regulation of #broadband by restricting what data plans companies can offer.

By prohibiting usage-based plans, the FCC would end up increasing prices FOR EVERYONE, including low-data users!

Reply on Twitter 1849132991164874848 Retweet on Twitter 1849132991164874848 6 Like on Twitter 1849132991164874848 2 Twitter 1849132991164874848
Retweet on Twitter CASE Retweeted
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
21 Oct

CASE Letter Urges FDA & FTC to Scrutinize Deal Between L’Oréal and Galderma -- "Both companies are currently under investigation or facing sizable lawsuits from claims that they have used harmful chemicals in their products."
https://caseforconsumers.org/2024/10/21/case-letter-urges-fda-ftc-to-scrutinize-deal-between-loreal-and-galderma/

Reply on Twitter 1848386046033010802 Retweet on Twitter 1848386046033010802 4 Like on Twitter 1848386046033010802 2 Twitter 1848386046033010802
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
23 Oct

Two weeks from election day, the supposedly independent @FCC is proposing price regulation of #broadband by restricting what data plans companies can offer.

By prohibiting usage-based plans, the FCC would end up increasing prices FOR EVERYONE, including low-data users!

Reply on Twitter 1849132991164874848 Retweet on Twitter 1849132991164874848 6 Like on Twitter 1849132991164874848 2 Twitter 1849132991164874848
Load More

Contact us for more information!

Send us an email so that we can get back to you, as soon as possible.

Send Message
Find out more about consumer issues View Issues

Find us here

  • Case for Consumers
  • 1800 Diagonal Road, Suite 600 Alexandria, VA 22314
  • 703-718-5011
  • info@caseforconsumers.org
  • caseforconsumers.org

Fresh from our blog

  • DOJ Is Right: Spectrum Consolidation Hurts Americans
  • Nuclear Energy Victory: Trump and Republicans Secure America’s Energy Future
  • Rail Labor is No Friend of the Trump Innovation Agenda
  • CASE Op-Ed in DC Journal: Crime is Driving Inflation: Why Congress Must Act on Cargo Theft

© 2025 · Case for Consumers

  • Home
  • About
  • Issues
  • Contact
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms & Condition
Prev Next