• Home
  • About
  • Issues
    • Column 1
      • Energy
      • Healthcare
      • Taxes & Spending
      • Technology
      • Consumer Safety
    • Column 2
      • Agriculture
      • Trade
      • Government Regulation
      • Banking & Investmets
      • Intellectual Property
    • Column 3
      • Property Rights
      • Legal Reform
      • Higher Education
      • Right To Work
      • Retail & Online Commerce
  • Newsroom
  • Contact
info@caseforconsumers.org
Case for ConsumersCase for Consumers
Case for ConsumersCase for Consumers
  • Home
  • About
  • Issues
    • Column 1
      • Energy
      • Healthcare
      • Taxes & Spending
      • Technology
      • Consumer Safety
    • Column 2
      • Agriculture
      • Trade
      • Government Regulation
      • Banking & Investmets
      • Intellectual Property
    • Column 3
      • Property Rights
      • Legal Reform
      • Higher Education
      • Right To Work
      • Retail & Online Commerce
  • Newsroom
  • Contact

Hospital Pricing: Nontransparent and Hurting Patients

Hospital Pricing: Nontransparent and Hurting Patients

Hospital Pricing: Nontransparent and Hurting Patients

May 2, 2019 Healthcare

As consumers, we all understand the need to shop around. When buying gas, a TV or even a car we can research the best price for what we need, finding the best option for our budget and lifestyle.

We don’t get the same transparency and choice in healthcare.

While you may be able to choose your health plan (unless you’re on an Obamacare market but that’s a whole other topic) few consumers can or do call around to find the best price for their care.

Since the cost of healthcare has always been relatively hidden, most Americans don’t even question this and end up paying whatever they are billed.

This week, the New York Times reported on a new study of hospital prices, showing the extent to which hospitals take advantage of the opaque supply chain and pricing structures to increase costs.

The study looked at the cost of a common metabolic blood panel, looking at real costs which insurance companies paid for these tests. The same test cost $11 in one location in Tampa, but $725 at a location in Miami.

Even more compelling, in Tampa, in addition to the $11 panel, another location, in the same market, cost $440. These are wild variations and, importantly, are divorced from any market force.

The report even notes that other everyday products, while there is price variation across markets, don’t see the same extreme variations across markets or within markets.

Hospitals take advantage of this nontransparent ecosystem to drive up costs.Because there is no transparency in pricing and because patients rarely are able to “shop around” for their hospital care, hospitals are able to charge insurers what they want. The result, consumers cannot find the best price and there is zero accountability for hospitals or other players that increase prices.

What does this mean for consumers? The article explains why these unfair pricing schemes increase costs for all patients:

Because these are prices paid by insurance companies, many experts say the differences between markets matter more, because they affect insurance premiums that all those with insurance in that area pay, even if they don’t get a blood test or an operation…The swing within markets increasingly matters for patients, too, as the share of employer plans with sizable deductibles keeps rising. That means that choosing a provider where your insurance company has failed to strike a good deal could mean significant out-of-pocket costs.

 In layman’s terms: insurers pass on higher market costs in the form of premiums and deductibles. The higher the costs in the market, the higher the cost of the insurance plans for patients and employers.

We also know that price transparency yields better results. A study of ambulatory surgical centers which listed prices for surgical services online saw 50 percent increases in patient volumes, as well as increases in revenue and, importantly, increases in patient satisfaction.

When nearly 20 percent of consumers have a form of medical debt, these issues and these prices matter. For everyday Americans, higher premium costs or higher deductibles can make or break their budget.

It’s time we took this pricing seriously and demand hospitals and insurance companies increase transparency for patients. It’s cliché, but when it comes to market forces sunlight really is the best disinfectant.

Tags: hospitalsObamacareprice transparency
Share
0

You also might be interested in

CASE Op-Ed: Changes to Part D Move Country Closer to Government-Run Health Care
K29FKM Elderly woman pushing a shopping cart with a senior riding inside it isolated on white background

CASE Op-Ed: Changes to Part D Move Country Closer to Government-Run Health Care

Feb 26, 2018

Matthew Kandrach – President, CASE February 26, 2018 – http://bit.ly/2BRIXLe The[...]

CASE Op-Ed: Obamacare Hasn’t Helped Solve the Problem of Rehospitalization

CASE Op-Ed: Obamacare Hasn’t Helped Solve the Problem of Rehospitalization

Feb 15, 2018

Matthew Kandrach – President, CASE Feb 15, 2018, 7:00 AM – http://washex.am/2CmQ2jr Many[...]

Hospital Prices: A Driving Force Behind Healthcare Spending

Hospital Prices: A Driving Force Behind Healthcare Spending

Aug 30, 2018

For most people, a trip to the hospital is frightening.[...]

Search

Categories

  • Aegis
  • Agriculture
  • Commerce
  • Communications
  • Consumer Safety
  • Crime
  • Data Privacy
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Energy
  • Entertainment
  • Environment
  • Financial Services
  • Fiscal Policy
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Ed on the Hill
  • Housing
  • Intellectual Property
  • Kentucky
  • Labor
  • Legal
  • Lifestyle
  • Manufacturing
  • Media
  • Regulation
  • Retail
  • Robotexts
  • Taxes
  • TCPA
  • Technology
  • Ticketmaster
  • Trade
  • Transportation
  • Uncategorized
  • Veterans

Archives

Contact Us

CASE Follow

Consumer Action for a Strong Economy - the Free Market Voice for America's Consumers; likes=bookmarks

CASE_forAmerica
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
23 Oct

.@POTUS’ IRA is driving up Part D premiums for millions of Medicare beneficiaries, yet Dems like @SenSanders continue to help tout this disastrous legislation. The Biden-Harris @WhiteHouse is misleading the public on their policy’s real impact.

Reply on Twitter 1849183731690409996 Retweet on Twitter 1849183731690409996 5 Like on Twitter 1849183731690409996 4 Twitter 1849183731690409996
Retweet on Twitter CASE Retweeted
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
23 Oct

Two weeks from election day, the supposedly independent @FCC is proposing price regulation of #broadband by restricting what data plans companies can offer.

By prohibiting usage-based plans, the FCC would end up increasing prices FOR EVERYONE, including low-data users!

Reply on Twitter 1849132991164874848 Retweet on Twitter 1849132991164874848 6 Like on Twitter 1849132991164874848 2 Twitter 1849132991164874848
Retweet on Twitter CASE Retweeted
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
21 Oct

CASE Letter Urges FDA & FTC to Scrutinize Deal Between L’Oréal and Galderma -- "Both companies are currently under investigation or facing sizable lawsuits from claims that they have used harmful chemicals in their products."
https://caseforconsumers.org/2024/10/21/case-letter-urges-fda-ftc-to-scrutinize-deal-between-loreal-and-galderma/

Reply on Twitter 1848386046033010802 Retweet on Twitter 1848386046033010802 4 Like on Twitter 1848386046033010802 2 Twitter 1848386046033010802
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
23 Oct

Two weeks from election day, the supposedly independent @FCC is proposing price regulation of #broadband by restricting what data plans companies can offer.

By prohibiting usage-based plans, the FCC would end up increasing prices FOR EVERYONE, including low-data users!

Reply on Twitter 1849132991164874848 Retweet on Twitter 1849132991164874848 6 Like on Twitter 1849132991164874848 2 Twitter 1849132991164874848
Load More

Contact us for more information!

Send us an email so that we can get back to you, as soon as possible.

Send Message
Find out more about consumer issues View Issues

Find us here

  • Case for Consumers
  • 1800 Diagonal Road, Suite 600 Alexandria, VA 22314
  • 703-718-5011
  • info@caseforconsumers.org
  • caseforconsumers.org

Fresh from our blog

  • Nuclear Energy Victory: Trump and Republicans Secure America’s Energy Future
  • Rail Labor is No Friend of the Trump Innovation Agenda
  • CASE Op-Ed in DC Journal: Crime is Driving Inflation: Why Congress Must Act on Cargo Theft
  • Don’t Put Opportunity Zones on the Investment Sidelines

© 2025 · Case for Consumers

  • Home
  • About
  • Issues
  • Contact
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms & Condition
Prev Next