• Home
  • About
  • Issues
    • Column 1
      • Energy
      • Healthcare
      • Taxes & Spending
      • Technology
      • Consumer Safety
    • Column 2
      • Agriculture
      • Trade
      • Government Regulation
      • Banking & Investmets
      • Intellectual Property
    • Column 3
      • Property Rights
      • Legal Reform
      • Higher Education
      • Right To Work
      • Retail & Online Commerce
  • Newsroom
  • Contact
info@caseforconsumers.org
Case for ConsumersCase for Consumers
Case for ConsumersCase for Consumers
  • Home
  • About
  • Issues
    • Column 1
      • Energy
      • Healthcare
      • Taxes & Spending
      • Technology
      • Consumer Safety
    • Column 2
      • Agriculture
      • Trade
      • Government Regulation
      • Banking & Investmets
      • Intellectual Property
    • Column 3
      • Property Rights
      • Legal Reform
      • Higher Education
      • Right To Work
      • Retail & Online Commerce
  • Newsroom
  • Contact

CASE Launches New Ad: Don’t Let HHS Put Insurer Interests Over Patient Savings

CASE Launches New Ad: Don’t Let HHS Put Insurer Interests Over Patient Savings

CASE Launches New Ad: Don’t Let HHS Put Insurer Interests Over Patient Savings

February 19, 2020 Healthcare

 

See Ad Here:

February 19, 2020

If there is one goal Republicans and Democrats have in common these days, it is ensuring healthcare is more affordable for all Americans. This election year, healthcare has been a central policy focus for President Trump, the Democratic presidential candidates, and Congress. It is truly confounding, then, that the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has come out of left field, with a proposal in its 2021 Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters (NBPP)—which would dramatically raise out of pocket costs for American patients.

CASE strongly opposes this HHS proposal, and has launched a new digital ad to highlight the harm to consumers from higher drug prices that will result. See our ad by clicking here:

In 2019, HHS appropriately proposed a policy that requires drug “manufacturer coupons to be counted toward patients’ annual limitation on cost-sharing in cases where a medically appropriate generic equivalent is not available.” Translated? Medications for rare diseases and chronic conditions—where there are often no “generic equivalents”—can be expensive. To alleviate this burden on patients, manufacturers offer copay assistance, making these drugs more affordable. The Department’s new proposal would reverse this.

In its new proposal, HHS would not allow these savings to be counted toward patient deductibles. If a patient has an annual deductible of $100 for a certain drug, but receives $50 in copay assistance from the manufacturer, they only pay $50 at their pharmacy, while still reapingthe benefits of the original $100 list price going toward the cost-sharing in their deductible—a win-win. In 2021, HHS would like to change this. In the scenario above, only the $50 paid at the pharmacy would now count toward a patient’s annual deductible, meaning their total out of pocket costs will be higher.

So, who are the big winners here? Insurers and Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs)—healthcare’s biggest middlemen—who are pushing for accumulator adjustment programs (AAP) like the scenario outlined above.Under this policy reversal, they would essentially be passing along higher prices to consumers, which not only increases out of pocket costs, but also threatens patient access to needed treatments

There is momentum in Congress and throughout the healthcare industry in the fight to tackle rising costs for consumers. But this proposal would immediately raise the amount of money people pay for their drugs. HHS must come to its senses soon before it does real harm to American patients.

Tags: accumulator adjustment programscopaysHHSPrescription Drugs
Share
1

You also might be interested in

The Small Molecule Penalty Mindlessly Pulls the Brake on Medical Innovation

The Small Molecule Penalty Mindlessly Pulls the Brake on Medical Innovation

Sep 13, 2023

  September 13, 2023 (Alexandria, Virginia) — Today Consumer Action[...]

CASE Op-ed: PBM Reforms Would Save Consumers Millions on Prescription Drugs

CASE Op-ed: PBM Reforms Would Save Consumers Millions on Prescription Drugs

Oct 19, 2017

Read full article here: by CASE President Matthew Kandrach Pharmacy[...]

Democrats’ Assault on Americans’ Healthcare Just Getting Started

Democrats’ Assault on Americans’ Healthcare Just Getting Started

Aug 18, 2022

  August 18, 2022 Gerard Scimeca Chairman, CASE As President[...]

Search

Categories

  • Aegis
  • Agriculture
  • Commerce
  • Communications
  • Consumer Safety
  • Crime
  • Data Privacy
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Energy
  • Entertainment
  • Environment
  • Financial Services
  • Fiscal Policy
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Ed on the Hill
  • Housing
  • Intellectual Property
  • Kentucky
  • Labor
  • Legal
  • Lifestyle
  • Manufacturing
  • Media
  • Regulation
  • Retail
  • Robotexts
  • Taxes
  • TCPA
  • Technology
  • Ticketmaster
  • Trade
  • Transportation
  • Uncategorized
  • Veterans

Archives

Contact Us

CASE Follow

Consumer Action for a Strong Economy - the Free Market Voice for America's Consumers; likes=bookmarks

CASE_forAmerica
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
23 Oct

.@POTUS’ IRA is driving up Part D premiums for millions of Medicare beneficiaries, yet Dems like @SenSanders continue to help tout this disastrous legislation. The Biden-Harris @WhiteHouse is misleading the public on their policy’s real impact.

Reply on Twitter 1849183731690409996 Retweet on Twitter 1849183731690409996 5 Like on Twitter 1849183731690409996 4 Twitter 1849183731690409996
Retweet on Twitter CASE Retweeted
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
23 Oct

Two weeks from election day, the supposedly independent @FCC is proposing price regulation of #broadband by restricting what data plans companies can offer.

By prohibiting usage-based plans, the FCC would end up increasing prices FOR EVERYONE, including low-data users!

Reply on Twitter 1849132991164874848 Retweet on Twitter 1849132991164874848 6 Like on Twitter 1849132991164874848 2 Twitter 1849132991164874848
Retweet on Twitter CASE Retweeted
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
21 Oct

CASE Letter Urges FDA & FTC to Scrutinize Deal Between L’Oréal and Galderma -- "Both companies are currently under investigation or facing sizable lawsuits from claims that they have used harmful chemicals in their products."
https://caseforconsumers.org/2024/10/21/case-letter-urges-fda-ftc-to-scrutinize-deal-between-loreal-and-galderma/

Reply on Twitter 1848386046033010802 Retweet on Twitter 1848386046033010802 4 Like on Twitter 1848386046033010802 2 Twitter 1848386046033010802
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
23 Oct

Two weeks from election day, the supposedly independent @FCC is proposing price regulation of #broadband by restricting what data plans companies can offer.

By prohibiting usage-based plans, the FCC would end up increasing prices FOR EVERYONE, including low-data users!

Reply on Twitter 1849132991164874848 Retweet on Twitter 1849132991164874848 6 Like on Twitter 1849132991164874848 2 Twitter 1849132991164874848
Load More

Contact us for more information!

Send us an email so that we can get back to you, as soon as possible.

Send Message
Find out more about consumer issues View Issues

Find us here

  • Case for Consumers
  • 1800 Diagonal Road, Suite 600 Alexandria, VA 22314
  • 703-718-5011
  • info@caseforconsumers.org
  • caseforconsumers.org

Fresh from our blog

  • DOJ Is Right: Spectrum Consolidation Hurts Americans
  • Nuclear Energy Victory: Trump and Republicans Secure America’s Energy Future
  • Rail Labor is No Friend of the Trump Innovation Agenda
  • CASE Op-Ed in DC Journal: Crime is Driving Inflation: Why Congress Must Act on Cargo Theft

© 2025 · Case for Consumers

  • Home
  • About
  • Issues
  • Contact
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms & Condition
Prev Next