• Home
  • About
  • Issues
    • Column 1
      • Energy
      • Healthcare
      • Taxes & Spending
      • Technology
      • Consumer Safety
    • Column 2
      • Agriculture
      • Trade
      • Government Regulation
      • Banking & Investmets
      • Intellectual Property
    • Column 3
      • Property Rights
      • Legal Reform
      • Higher Education
      • Right To Work
      • Retail & Online Commerce
  • Newsroom
  • Contact
info@caseforconsumers.org
Case for ConsumersCase for Consumers
Case for ConsumersCase for Consumers
  • Home
  • About
  • Issues
    • Column 1
      • Energy
      • Healthcare
      • Taxes & Spending
      • Technology
      • Consumer Safety
    • Column 2
      • Agriculture
      • Trade
      • Government Regulation
      • Banking & Investmets
      • Intellectual Property
    • Column 3
      • Property Rights
      • Legal Reform
      • Higher Education
      • Right To Work
      • Retail & Online Commerce
  • Newsroom
  • Contact

CASE Op-Ed – Issues & Insights: Labor Dept Goes Rogue on Americans Saving for Retirement

CASE Op-Ed – Issues & Insights: Labor Dept Goes Rogue on Americans Saving for Retirement

CASE Op-Ed – Issues & Insights: Labor Dept Goes Rogue on Americans Saving for Retirement

March 17, 2022 Financial Services

 

March 17, 2022

In a blow to middle-income families across the United States, the Labor Department appears to be moving forward with plans to slap more restrictions on their retirement savings.

A proposed rule currently under discussion would broaden the definition of which investment professionals must be classified as fiduciaries under the 1974 Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). This misguided proposal stands to fundamentally limit the number of Americans who have access to affordable retirement planning.

This is not the first time Labor has tried to strengthen its grip on retirement investment advisors through regulatory fiat. In 2016, the department issued a similar rule, known as the Fiduciary Rule, aimed at reclassifying the status of nearly all investment professionals and financial institutions working with retirement savers.

The Fiduciary Rule would have effectively eliminated the most affordable savings option used by most Americans – commission-based financial guidance – where they pay per transaction.

If implemented, Americans would have been left with primarily fee-based advisory arrangements, typically where investors pay their financial professionals a percentage of their assets under management, which are often costlier and less accessible. By removing both choice and competition from the market, the lower-income Americans, whom the DOL claimed would benefit from the new rule, stood to be the most harmed.

Even economists at the left-leaning Brookings Institute commented to the Labor Department that fee-based advisory “may seem to take less of the investor’s funds, but that is not usually the case. . . . Regulations that push savers into accounts with (ongoing fees instead of commissions) may not be in their best interests.”

Read full article here:

Tags: Department of LaborERISAfiduciary ruleretirement
Share
0

You also might be interested in

CASE Op-Ed – Washington Times: What To Do About Prescription Drug Prices

CASE Op-Ed – Washington Times: What To Do About Prescription Drug Prices

Nov 7, 2019

  Matthew Kandrach – President, CASE November 7, 2019 Few[...]

CASE Op-Ed in RealClear Markets: Economic Freedom Is Under Assault In Washington

CASE Op-Ed in RealClear Markets: Economic Freedom Is Under Assault In Washington

Jun 9, 2023

  June 9, 2023 Foolish policies over the past few[...]

CASE Op-Ed – The Hill: Biden Shouldn’t Regulate Independent Contractors Out of Work

Feb 8, 2021

  Gerard Scimeca – co-founder CASE February 7, 2021 Late[...]

Search

Categories

  • Aegis
  • Agriculture
  • Commerce
  • Communications
  • Consumer Safety
  • Crime
  • Data Privacy
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Energy
  • Entertainment
  • Environment
  • Financial Services
  • Fiscal Policy
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Ed on the Hill
  • Housing
  • Intellectual Property
  • Kentucky
  • Labor
  • Legal
  • Lifestyle
  • Manufacturing
  • Media
  • Regulation
  • Retail
  • Robotexts
  • Taxes
  • TCPA
  • Technology
  • Ticketmaster
  • Trade
  • Transportation
  • Uncategorized
  • Veterans

Archives

Contact Us

CASE Follow

Consumer Action for a Strong Economy - the Free Market Voice for America's Consumers; likes=bookmarks

CASE_forAmerica
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
23 Oct

.@POTUS’ IRA is driving up Part D premiums for millions of Medicare beneficiaries, yet Dems like @SenSanders continue to help tout this disastrous legislation. The Biden-Harris @WhiteHouse is misleading the public on their policy’s real impact.

Reply on Twitter 1849183731690409996 Retweet on Twitter 1849183731690409996 5 Like on Twitter 1849183731690409996 4 Twitter 1849183731690409996
Retweet on Twitter CASE Retweeted
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
23 Oct

Two weeks from election day, the supposedly independent @FCC is proposing price regulation of #broadband by restricting what data plans companies can offer.

By prohibiting usage-based plans, the FCC would end up increasing prices FOR EVERYONE, including low-data users!

Reply on Twitter 1849132991164874848 Retweet on Twitter 1849132991164874848 6 Like on Twitter 1849132991164874848 2 Twitter 1849132991164874848
Retweet on Twitter CASE Retweeted
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
21 Oct

CASE Letter Urges FDA & FTC to Scrutinize Deal Between L’Oréal and Galderma -- "Both companies are currently under investigation or facing sizable lawsuits from claims that they have used harmful chemicals in their products."
https://caseforconsumers.org/2024/10/21/case-letter-urges-fda-ftc-to-scrutinize-deal-between-loreal-and-galderma/

Reply on Twitter 1848386046033010802 Retweet on Twitter 1848386046033010802 4 Like on Twitter 1848386046033010802 2 Twitter 1848386046033010802
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
23 Oct

Two weeks from election day, the supposedly independent @FCC is proposing price regulation of #broadband by restricting what data plans companies can offer.

By prohibiting usage-based plans, the FCC would end up increasing prices FOR EVERYONE, including low-data users!

Reply on Twitter 1849132991164874848 Retweet on Twitter 1849132991164874848 6 Like on Twitter 1849132991164874848 2 Twitter 1849132991164874848
Load More

Contact us for more information!

Send us an email so that we can get back to you, as soon as possible.

Send Message
Find out more about consumer issues View Issues

Find us here

  • Case for Consumers
  • 1800 Diagonal Road, Suite 600 Alexandria, VA 22314
  • 703-718-5011
  • info@caseforconsumers.org
  • caseforconsumers.org

Fresh from our blog

  • DOJ Is Right: Spectrum Consolidation Hurts Americans
  • Nuclear Energy Victory: Trump and Republicans Secure America’s Energy Future
  • Rail Labor is No Friend of the Trump Innovation Agenda
  • CASE Op-Ed in DC Journal: Crime is Driving Inflation: Why Congress Must Act on Cargo Theft

© 2025 · Case for Consumers

  • Home
  • About
  • Issues
  • Contact
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms & Condition
Prev Next