• Home
  • About
  • Issues
    • Column 1
      • Energy
      • Healthcare
      • Taxes & Spending
      • Technology
      • Consumer Safety
    • Column 2
      • Agriculture
      • Trade
      • Government Regulation
      • Banking & Investmets
      • Intellectual Property
    • Column 3
      • Property Rights
      • Legal Reform
      • Higher Education
      • Right To Work
      • Retail & Online Commerce
  • Newsroom
  • Contact
info@caseforconsumers.org
Case for ConsumersCase for Consumers
Case for ConsumersCase for Consumers
  • Home
  • About
  • Issues
    • Column 1
      • Energy
      • Healthcare
      • Taxes & Spending
      • Technology
      • Consumer Safety
    • Column 2
      • Agriculture
      • Trade
      • Government Regulation
      • Banking & Investmets
      • Intellectual Property
    • Column 3
      • Property Rights
      • Legal Reform
      • Higher Education
      • Right To Work
      • Retail & Online Commerce
  • Newsroom
  • Contact

CASE Op-Ed in Washington Reporter: 3 Cheers for Overdraft Fees

CASE Op-Ed in Washington Reporter: 3 Cheers for Overdraft Fees

CASE Op-Ed in Washington Reporter: 3 Cheers for Overdraft Fees

March 26, 2025 Financial Services

Like the sanitation crew in the aftermath of an outdoor music festival, the Trump administration and Congressional Republicans are now investing a generous portion of their energies cleaning up the mess left by Joe Biden’s army of activist bureaucrats.

A month after America roundly rejected Biden’s policies at the polls, the outgoing administration published its Fall 2024 Unified Agenda that included a swarm of 11th hour regulatory rules and bureaucratic proposals. A whopping 53 regulations met the definition of “economically significant” for having an impact of $200 million or more on the economy.

The regulations showered down on D.C. with an intensity that would have made Pharaoh release the Israelites. Thankfully, many of these rules were never finalized, meaning Trump appointees can happily let them die on the vine. The rest leave Congress a mere 60 days from their enactment to either let stand or erase from the books through the Congressional Review Act (CRA).

One regulation of priority to the GOP House is the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) rule mandating banks cap overdraft fees at $5.00, an action as absurdly beyond the bureau’s authority as the Coast Guard regulating pet groomers. Compounding the absurdity is that this cap will directly harm the people it is most purported to help.

Opting for overdraft protection is entirely voluntary, like buying avocados. If one thinks avocados are too expensive the option always exists not to purchase them; no bureaucratic rule need be proposed. Millions of bank customers could just as easily forgo overdraft protection yet choose it because they value the convenience it provides, offering a lifeline during a short-term financial crunch and preventing bounced check fees charged by merchants.

The price of this service, like haircuts, or wristwatches, or cat toys, should be set by the market, between buyer and seller to reflect its market value. The CFPB ignores mountains of historical evidence showing price caps not only lead to a reduced supply of the product or service capped, but create a ripple effect forcing businesses to raise prices or cut services elsewhere. And with the certainty of a Nancy Pelosi stock tip, these higher costs and reduced banking services will prove most devastating to lower-income Americans.

Read full article here:

Tags: Biden administrationCFPBOverdraft Fees
Share
0

You also might be interested in

CASE Op-Ed – RealClear Markets: Interest Rate Caps Don’t Protect Borrowers, They Just Make Borrowing Difficult

CASE Op-Ed – RealClear Markets: Interest Rate Caps Don’t Protect Borrowers, They Just Make Borrowing Difficult

Jun 12, 2019

  Gerard Scimeca – Chairman, CASE June 12, 2019 From Sacramento[...]

CASE Op-Ed, Inside Sources: CFPB Complaint Database Offers Lots to Complain About

CASE Op-Ed, Inside Sources: CFPB Complaint Database Offers Lots to Complain About

Mar 26, 2019

Gerard Scimeca – Chairman, CASE March 26, 2019 – https://bit.ly/2OqXzFD Thanks[...]

CASE Op-Ed – RealClear Policy: To Protect Consumers, the BCFP Must Listen to Them

CASE Op-Ed – RealClear Policy: To Protect Consumers, the BCFP Must Listen to Them

Oct 12, 2018

Matthew Kandrach – President, CASE October 12, 2918 – https://bit.ly/2CcBczJ Only[...]

Search

Categories

  • Aegis
  • Agriculture
  • Commerce
  • Communications
  • Consumer Safety
  • Crime
  • Data Privacy
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Energy
  • Entertainment
  • Environment
  • Financial Services
  • Fiscal Policy
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Ed on the Hill
  • Housing
  • Intellectual Property
  • Kentucky
  • Labor
  • Legal
  • Lifestyle
  • Manufacturing
  • Media
  • Regulation
  • Retail
  • Robotexts
  • Taxes
  • TCPA
  • Technology
  • Ticketmaster
  • Trade
  • Transportation
  • Uncategorized
  • Veterans

Archives

Contact Us

CASE Follow

Consumer Action for a Strong Economy - the Free Market Voice for America's Consumers; likes=bookmarks

CASE_forAmerica
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
23 Oct

.@POTUS’ IRA is driving up Part D premiums for millions of Medicare beneficiaries, yet Dems like @SenSanders continue to help tout this disastrous legislation. The Biden-Harris @WhiteHouse is misleading the public on their policy’s real impact.

Reply on Twitter 1849183731690409996 Retweet on Twitter 1849183731690409996 5 Like on Twitter 1849183731690409996 4 Twitter 1849183731690409996
Retweet on Twitter CASE Retweeted
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
23 Oct

Two weeks from election day, the supposedly independent @FCC is proposing price regulation of #broadband by restricting what data plans companies can offer.

By prohibiting usage-based plans, the FCC would end up increasing prices FOR EVERYONE, including low-data users!

Reply on Twitter 1849132991164874848 Retweet on Twitter 1849132991164874848 6 Like on Twitter 1849132991164874848 2 Twitter 1849132991164874848
Retweet on Twitter CASE Retweeted
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
21 Oct

CASE Letter Urges FDA & FTC to Scrutinize Deal Between L’Oréal and Galderma -- "Both companies are currently under investigation or facing sizable lawsuits from claims that they have used harmful chemicals in their products."
https://caseforconsumers.org/2024/10/21/case-letter-urges-fda-ftc-to-scrutinize-deal-between-loreal-and-galderma/

Reply on Twitter 1848386046033010802 Retweet on Twitter 1848386046033010802 4 Like on Twitter 1848386046033010802 2 Twitter 1848386046033010802
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
23 Oct

Two weeks from election day, the supposedly independent @FCC is proposing price regulation of #broadband by restricting what data plans companies can offer.

By prohibiting usage-based plans, the FCC would end up increasing prices FOR EVERYONE, including low-data users!

Reply on Twitter 1849132991164874848 Retweet on Twitter 1849132991164874848 6 Like on Twitter 1849132991164874848 2 Twitter 1849132991164874848
Load More

Contact us for more information!

Send us an email so that we can get back to you, as soon as possible.

Send Message
Find out more about consumer issues View Issues

Find us here

  • Case for Consumers
  • 1800 Diagonal Road, Suite 600 Alexandria, VA 22314
  • 703-718-5011
  • info@caseforconsumers.org
  • caseforconsumers.org

Fresh from our blog

  • Nuclear Energy Victory: Trump and Republicans Secure America’s Energy Future
  • Rail Labor is No Friend of the Trump Innovation Agenda
  • CASE Op-Ed in DC Journal: Crime is Driving Inflation: Why Congress Must Act on Cargo Theft
  • Don’t Put Opportunity Zones on the Investment Sidelines

© 2025 · Case for Consumers

  • Home
  • About
  • Issues
  • Contact
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms & Condition
Prev Next