• Home
  • About
  • Issues
    • Column 1
      • Energy
      • Healthcare
      • Taxes & Spending
      • Technology
      • Consumer Safety
    • Column 2
      • Agriculture
      • Trade
      • Government Regulation
      • Banking & Investmets
      • Intellectual Property
    • Column 3
      • Property Rights
      • Legal Reform
      • Higher Education
      • Right To Work
      • Retail & Online Commerce
  • Newsroom
  • Contact
info@caseforconsumers.org
Case for ConsumersCase for Consumers
Case for ConsumersCase for Consumers
  • Home
  • About
  • Issues
    • Column 1
      • Energy
      • Healthcare
      • Taxes & Spending
      • Technology
      • Consumer Safety
    • Column 2
      • Agriculture
      • Trade
      • Government Regulation
      • Banking & Investmets
      • Intellectual Property
    • Column 3
      • Property Rights
      • Legal Reform
      • Higher Education
      • Right To Work
      • Retail & Online Commerce
  • Newsroom
  • Contact

CASE Op-Ed in DC Journal: Senate Bill Will Close Tax Loophole on Foreign Lawsuit Funders

CASE Op-Ed in DC Journal: Senate Bill Will Close Tax Loophole on Foreign Lawsuit Funders

CASE Op-Ed in DC Journal: Senate Bill Will Close Tax Loophole on Foreign Lawsuit Funders

June 30, 2025 Legal, Regulation

The lack of regulation surrounding third-party litigation funding (TPLF) creates a significant legal loophole that could allow hedge funds, foreign investors and sovereign wealth funds to profit from U.S. lawsuits, delay justice and increase costs for taxpayers. What seems to be an obvious problem to fix has recently drawn scrutiny from “consumer” groups that argue for no regulation or transparency. Allowing predatory litigation funders to go unchecked will only hurt, not help, the U.S. taxpayers.

In less than 20 years, TPLF has grown into a $15 billion investment industry. Investors are often hedge funds or other money management firms looking to profit from a settlement or court award. TPLF investors are not “local” groups posing a threat; foreign actors using the TPLF may pose a national security threat

These adversaries benefit from funding U.S. lawsuits, which enables them to gain access to business trade secrets through our courts and manipulate the market in ways that harm American innovation and competitiveness. This system comes at a cost for consumers, contributing to the soaring “tort tax” that all Americans pay. The 2025 “tort tax” is in excess of $1,600 annually per person, higher than in prior years. If lawmakers don’t get TPLF under control and properly regulated, America’s “tort tax” will continue to increase.

We hope that law firms voluntarily disclose outside involvement in their cases. Without mandatory disclosure requirements, there’s no way for judges, juries or defendants to know who’s behind a lawsuit, what their financial interests are, or whether a foreign entity is influencing the litigation for profit or political leverage.

Read full article here.

Tags: tort reformTPLF
Share
0

You also might be interested in

Sen. Tillis Bill Will End the Trial Lawyer Gravy Train

Sen. Tillis Bill Will End the Trial Lawyer Gravy Train

May 30, 2025

  The cost of doing business in America is rising—and[...]

CASE Thanks Senator Tillis for Taking Bold Stand Against Foreign-Funded Lawsuits

CASE Thanks Senator Tillis for Taking Bold Stand Against Foreign-Funded Lawsuits

Jun 27, 2025

CASE Thanks Senator Tillis for Taking Bold Stand Against Foreign-Funded[...]

CASE Op-Ed in Townhall: A Renewed Focus on Legal Reform Offers a Quick Path to Economic Stimulus

CASE Op-Ed in Townhall: A Renewed Focus on Legal Reform Offers a Quick Path to Economic Stimulus

Oct 25, 2023

  October 25, 2023 People can get a good chuckle[...]

Search

Categories

  • Aegis
  • Agriculture
  • Commerce
  • Communications
  • Consumer Safety
  • Crime
  • Data Privacy
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Energy
  • Entertainment
  • Environment
  • Financial Services
  • Fiscal Policy
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Ed on the Hill
  • Housing
  • Intellectual Property
  • Kentucky
  • Labor
  • Legal
  • Lifestyle
  • Manufacturing
  • Media
  • Regulation
  • Retail
  • Robotexts
  • Taxes
  • TCPA
  • Technology
  • Ticketmaster
  • Trade
  • Transportation
  • Uncategorized
  • Veterans

Archives

Contact Us

CASE Follow

Consumer Action for a Strong Economy - the Free Market Voice for America's Consumers; likes=bookmarks

CASE_forAmerica
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
23 Oct

.@POTUS’ IRA is driving up Part D premiums for millions of Medicare beneficiaries, yet Dems like @SenSanders continue to help tout this disastrous legislation. The Biden-Harris @WhiteHouse is misleading the public on their policy’s real impact.

Reply on Twitter 1849183731690409996 Retweet on Twitter 1849183731690409996 5 Like on Twitter 1849183731690409996 4 Twitter 1849183731690409996
Retweet on Twitter CASE Retweeted
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
23 Oct

Two weeks from election day, the supposedly independent @FCC is proposing price regulation of #broadband by restricting what data plans companies can offer.

By prohibiting usage-based plans, the FCC would end up increasing prices FOR EVERYONE, including low-data users!

Reply on Twitter 1849132991164874848 Retweet on Twitter 1849132991164874848 6 Like on Twitter 1849132991164874848 2 Twitter 1849132991164874848
Retweet on Twitter CASE Retweeted
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
21 Oct

CASE Letter Urges FDA & FTC to Scrutinize Deal Between L’Oréal and Galderma -- "Both companies are currently under investigation or facing sizable lawsuits from claims that they have used harmful chemicals in their products."
https://caseforconsumers.org/2024/10/21/case-letter-urges-fda-ftc-to-scrutinize-deal-between-loreal-and-galderma/

Reply on Twitter 1848386046033010802 Retweet on Twitter 1848386046033010802 4 Like on Twitter 1848386046033010802 2 Twitter 1848386046033010802
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
23 Oct

Two weeks from election day, the supposedly independent @FCC is proposing price regulation of #broadband by restricting what data plans companies can offer.

By prohibiting usage-based plans, the FCC would end up increasing prices FOR EVERYONE, including low-data users!

Reply on Twitter 1849132991164874848 Retweet on Twitter 1849132991164874848 6 Like on Twitter 1849132991164874848 2 Twitter 1849132991164874848
Load More

Contact us for more information!

Send us an email so that we can get back to you, as soon as possible.

Send Message
Find out more about consumer issues View Issues

Find us here

  • Case for Consumers
  • 1800 Diagonal Road, Suite 600 Alexandria, VA 22314
  • 703-718-5011
  • info@caseforconsumers.org
  • caseforconsumers.org

Fresh from our blog

  • Nuclear Energy Victory: Trump and Republicans Secure America’s Energy Future
  • Rail Labor is No Friend of the Trump Innovation Agenda
  • CASE Op-Ed in DC Journal: Crime is Driving Inflation: Why Congress Must Act on Cargo Theft
  • Don’t Put Opportunity Zones on the Investment Sidelines

© 2025 · Case for Consumers

  • Home
  • About
  • Issues
  • Contact
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms & Condition
Prev Next