• Home
  • About
  • Issues
    • Column 1
      • Energy
      • Healthcare
      • Taxes & Spending
      • Technology
      • Consumer Safety
    • Column 2
      • Agriculture
      • Trade
      • Government Regulation
      • Banking & Investmets
      • Intellectual Property
    • Column 3
      • Property Rights
      • Legal Reform
      • Higher Education
      • Right To Work
      • Retail & Online Commerce
  • Newsroom
  • Contact
info@caseforconsumers.org
Case for ConsumersCase for Consumers
Case for ConsumersCase for Consumers
  • Home
  • About
  • Issues
    • Column 1
      • Energy
      • Healthcare
      • Taxes & Spending
      • Technology
      • Consumer Safety
    • Column 2
      • Agriculture
      • Trade
      • Government Regulation
      • Banking & Investmets
      • Intellectual Property
    • Column 3
      • Property Rights
      • Legal Reform
      • Higher Education
      • Right To Work
      • Retail & Online Commerce
  • Newsroom
  • Contact

CASE Op-Ed, Ft. Myers News-Press: Rep. Rooney’s Carbon Tax Plan Will Raise Temperatures of His Constituents

CASE Op-Ed, Ft. Myers News-Press: Rep. Rooney’s Carbon Tax Plan Will Raise Temperatures of His Constituents

CASE Op-Ed, Ft. Myers News-Press: Rep. Rooney’s Carbon Tax Plan Will Raise Temperatures of His Constituents

April 3, 2019 Environment, Taxes

Gerard Scimeca – Chairman, CASE
April 3, 2019 – https://bit.ly/2Uyyzlp

As Democrats increasingly embrace socialism, the more sober among us remain quite aware of the disaster that socialism has wreaked throughout history, or continues to do today in nations like Venezuela. Willful blindness, it seems, is a growing epidemic. It is extremely troubling than that a self-described conservative lawmaker would join the ranks of those choosing to ignore history with his own case of acute myopia. Whatever name they may go by, big government plans designed to take more of our money while limiting personal freedoms are doomed to fail.

In this instance, it is Rep. Francis Rooney co-sponsoring something called the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (EICDA), legislation touted as “bi-partisan” with only Rooney as a GOP signer. The proposal is little more than a recycled version of a cornerstone issue for the radical environmental movement, the dreaded carbon tax, long championed by liberals such as Nancy Pelosi, Al Gore, and Hillary Clinton. The point of a carbon tax is to jack up prices on anything that introduces carbon into the economy, from mining to refining to imported goods. Obviously, carbon is in just about everything Americans use and purchase, leading Mark Mills of the Manhattan Institute to call it a “tax on existence.”

Like socialism, the carbon tax is a massive fail that has met with disaster and rejection at every turn. Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau faced a fierce backlash on his carbon tax plan when even liberal-minded officials called it a “job killer,” forcing him to scale it back. In France, a similar fuel tax has sparked violent riots and clashes with police, so devastating was its effect on the French economy.

Congressman Rooney’s largely conservative constituents clearly didn’t have a massive new energy tax in mind when they voted for him. The carbon tax is a giant social engineering experiment, designed to make reliable and affordable energy so painfully expensive that it forces us to use renewable sources like wind and solar. Clearly, if people want wind and solar they have every right and freedom now to pay for it (usually through government subsidies), but consumer freedom is just one casualty of the carbon tax.

Supporters claim it will “save the planet,” by weaning us off fossil fuels and return a “dividend” back to consumers and taxpayers. This is nonsense. America is among the top nations in reducing carbon dioxide without the tax. Meanwhile, Asia and Europe are increasing their emissions. Rooney’s carbon tax, which disproportionately hurts low-income consumers, would lower American living standards while subsidizing other nations.

The tax will further have zero impact on global temperatures. Even when going by the government’s own climate science data, the effect of Rooney’s carbon tax would be absolutely negligible. Under the most optimistic scenarios, the effect would amount to mere fractions of a degree.

There’s plenty more not to like about the tax, including that it increases over the rate of inflation for the next three decades, slows economic growth, makes America less competitive, and creates a giant slush fund for politicians to give away to environmental activists and favored constituencies. Spoiler alert: there will be no “dividend.”

One can expect hare-brained, Utopian schemes from Democrats, who are always looking for ways to take our money and weigh down our economy. But it is downright disappointing to see Congressman Rooney in cahoots with this bunch while attempting to sell the fake veneer of “bi-partisanship.” Instead of pretending to save the planet, he should be saving us all from this massive, painful, and destructive tax.

Tags: Canadacarbon taxEICDAFranceFrancis Rooney
Share
0

You also might be interested in

Importation Threatens American Patients

Importation Threatens American Patients

Dec 19, 2019

December 19, 2019 Today, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)[...]

CASE Letter to Senate Leaders Makes Devastating Case Against Drug Importation Plans

CASE Letter to Senate Leaders Makes Devastating Case Against Drug Importation Plans

May 11, 2022

May 11, 2022 Dear Senate Leaders, In spite of well-founded[...]

CASE Op-Ed – Washington Examiner: The USMCA hinges on removing tariffs and quotas

CASE Op-Ed – Washington Examiner: The USMCA hinges on removing tariffs and quotas

Jun 18, 2019

  Gerard Scimeca – Chairman, CASE June 18, 2019 Establishing[...]

Search

Categories

  • Aegis
  • Agriculture
  • Commerce
  • Communications
  • Consumer Safety
  • Crime
  • Data Privacy
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Energy
  • Entertainment
  • Environment
  • Financial Services
  • Fiscal Policy
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Ed on the Hill
  • Housing
  • Intellectual Property
  • Kentucky
  • Labor
  • Legal
  • Lifestyle
  • Manufacturing
  • Media
  • Regulation
  • Retail
  • Robotexts
  • Taxes
  • TCPA
  • Technology
  • Ticketmaster
  • Trade
  • Transportation
  • Uncategorized
  • Veterans

Archives

Contact Us

CASE Follow

Consumer Action for a Strong Economy - the Free Market Voice for America's Consumers; likes=bookmarks

CASE_forAmerica
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
23 Oct

.@POTUS’ IRA is driving up Part D premiums for millions of Medicare beneficiaries, yet Dems like @SenSanders continue to help tout this disastrous legislation. The Biden-Harris @WhiteHouse is misleading the public on their policy’s real impact.

Reply on Twitter 1849183731690409996 Retweet on Twitter 1849183731690409996 5 Like on Twitter 1849183731690409996 4 Twitter 1849183731690409996
Retweet on Twitter CASE Retweeted
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
23 Oct

Two weeks from election day, the supposedly independent @FCC is proposing price regulation of #broadband by restricting what data plans companies can offer.

By prohibiting usage-based plans, the FCC would end up increasing prices FOR EVERYONE, including low-data users!

Reply on Twitter 1849132991164874848 Retweet on Twitter 1849132991164874848 6 Like on Twitter 1849132991164874848 2 Twitter 1849132991164874848
Retweet on Twitter CASE Retweeted
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
21 Oct

CASE Letter Urges FDA & FTC to Scrutinize Deal Between L’Oréal and Galderma -- "Both companies are currently under investigation or facing sizable lawsuits from claims that they have used harmful chemicals in their products."
https://caseforconsumers.org/2024/10/21/case-letter-urges-fda-ftc-to-scrutinize-deal-between-loreal-and-galderma/

Reply on Twitter 1848386046033010802 Retweet on Twitter 1848386046033010802 4 Like on Twitter 1848386046033010802 2 Twitter 1848386046033010802
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
23 Oct

Two weeks from election day, the supposedly independent @FCC is proposing price regulation of #broadband by restricting what data plans companies can offer.

By prohibiting usage-based plans, the FCC would end up increasing prices FOR EVERYONE, including low-data users!

Reply on Twitter 1849132991164874848 Retweet on Twitter 1849132991164874848 6 Like on Twitter 1849132991164874848 2 Twitter 1849132991164874848
Load More

Contact us for more information!

Send us an email so that we can get back to you, as soon as possible.

Send Message
Find out more about consumer issues View Issues

Find us here

  • Case for Consumers
  • 1800 Diagonal Road, Suite 600 Alexandria, VA 22314
  • 703-718-5011
  • info@caseforconsumers.org
  • caseforconsumers.org

Fresh from our blog

  • Nuclear Energy Victory: Trump and Republicans Secure America’s Energy Future
  • Rail Labor is No Friend of the Trump Innovation Agenda
  • CASE Op-Ed in DC Journal: Crime is Driving Inflation: Why Congress Must Act on Cargo Theft
  • Don’t Put Opportunity Zones on the Investment Sidelines

© 2025 · Case for Consumers

  • Home
  • About
  • Issues
  • Contact
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms & Condition
Prev Next