• Home
  • About
  • Issues
    • Column 1
      • Energy
      • Healthcare
      • Taxes & Spending
      • Technology
      • Consumer Safety
    • Column 2
      • Agriculture
      • Trade
      • Government Regulation
      • Banking & Investmets
      • Intellectual Property
    • Column 3
      • Property Rights
      • Legal Reform
      • Higher Education
      • Right To Work
      • Retail & Online Commerce
  • Newsroom
  • Contact
info@caseforconsumers.org
Case for ConsumersCase for Consumers
Case for ConsumersCase for Consumers
  • Home
  • About
  • Issues
    • Column 1
      • Energy
      • Healthcare
      • Taxes & Spending
      • Technology
      • Consumer Safety
    • Column 2
      • Agriculture
      • Trade
      • Government Regulation
      • Banking & Investmets
      • Intellectual Property
    • Column 3
      • Property Rights
      • Legal Reform
      • Higher Education
      • Right To Work
      • Retail & Online Commerce
  • Newsroom
  • Contact

CASE Letter Warns North Carolina Congressional Delegation of Danger of Weaker Patent Protections

September 24, 2024

 

Members of the North Carolina Congressional Delegation:

Consumer Action for a Strong Economy (CASE) writes today to express strong opposition to misguided calls to undermine America’s historically strong patent protections.

While CASE welcomes the opportunity for constructive dialogue about ways to help lower prescription drug costs for consumers, abusing laws like Section 1498 to lower prices ignores how the pharmaceutical innovation ecosystem actually works. The approach also fails to address the real problems plaguing the American healthcare system.

Bringing a new drug to market is expensive and time-consuming. Innovative companies spend an average of $2.6 billion on research and development over 10+ years before they can offer a new treatment to patients. Moreover, according to the Congressional Budget Office, only 12 percent of drugs that start clinical trials ultimately receive FDA approval. Creating new medicines is a risky business, and companies need to be able to secure a return on investment. Without strong patent and intellectual property (IP) rights to protect their innovations, businesses will lack the incentive to engage in the crucial research that goes into developing novel treatments and therapies, ultimately depriving patients of access to care.

Calls to undermine these IP protections also ignore the root causes of skyrocketing prices, which lie in anti-competitive practices by pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), as established by a Federal Trade Commission report from earlier this year. With just six companies controlling 95 percent of the prescription drug market in the United States, PBMs wield outsized power over prescription drug prices.

Lawmakers’ time would be far better spent investigating the role these middlemen play in increasing costs for prescription drugs in this country. Particularly, lawmakers should focus their attention on PBMs’ rebate system, which favors drugs with higher list prices due to the larger rebates PBMs can extract from manufacturers. This incentive structure means one thing: the largest and most powerful PBMs profit while consumer costs rise and patients suffer.

Thanks to medical innovators on the other hand, Americans now have access to revolutionary new products like diabetes and obesity medications. We cannot jeopardize future breakthroughs that will continue to improve patient outcomes, all while healthcare middlemen get away with manipulating the system to line their own pockets.

Sincerely,

Consumer Action for a Strong Economy (CASE)

____________________________

Consumer Action for a Strong Economy
1800 Diagonal Road, Suite 600
Alexandria, VA 22314

@CASE_forAmerica

Search

Categories

  • Aegis
  • Agriculture
  • Commerce
  • Communications
  • Consumer Safety
  • Crime
  • Data Privacy
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Energy
  • Entertainment
  • Environment
  • Financial Services
  • Fiscal Policy
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Ed on the Hill
  • Housing
  • Intellectual Property
  • Kentucky
  • Labor
  • Legal
  • Lifestyle
  • Manufacturing
  • Media
  • Regulation
  • Retail
  • Robotexts
  • Taxes
  • TCPA
  • Technology
  • Ticketmaster
  • Trade
  • Transportation
  • Uncategorized
  • Veterans

Archives

Contact Us

CASE Follow

Consumer Action for a Strong Economy - the Free Market Voice for America's Consumers; likes=bookmarks

CASE_forAmerica
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
23 Oct

.@POTUS’ IRA is driving up Part D premiums for millions of Medicare beneficiaries, yet Dems like @SenSanders continue to help tout this disastrous legislation. The Biden-Harris @WhiteHouse is misleading the public on their policy’s real impact.

Reply on Twitter 1849183731690409996 Retweet on Twitter 1849183731690409996 5 Like on Twitter 1849183731690409996 4 Twitter 1849183731690409996
Retweet on Twitter CASE Retweeted
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
23 Oct

Two weeks from election day, the supposedly independent @FCC is proposing price regulation of #broadband by restricting what data plans companies can offer.

By prohibiting usage-based plans, the FCC would end up increasing prices FOR EVERYONE, including low-data users!

Reply on Twitter 1849132991164874848 Retweet on Twitter 1849132991164874848 6 Like on Twitter 1849132991164874848 2 Twitter 1849132991164874848
Retweet on Twitter CASE Retweeted
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
21 Oct

CASE Letter Urges FDA & FTC to Scrutinize Deal Between L’Oréal and Galderma -- "Both companies are currently under investigation or facing sizable lawsuits from claims that they have used harmful chemicals in their products."
https://caseforconsumers.org/2024/10/21/case-letter-urges-fda-ftc-to-scrutinize-deal-between-loreal-and-galderma/

Reply on Twitter 1848386046033010802 Retweet on Twitter 1848386046033010802 4 Like on Twitter 1848386046033010802 2 Twitter 1848386046033010802
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
23 Oct

Two weeks from election day, the supposedly independent @FCC is proposing price regulation of #broadband by restricting what data plans companies can offer.

By prohibiting usage-based plans, the FCC would end up increasing prices FOR EVERYONE, including low-data users!

Reply on Twitter 1849132991164874848 Retweet on Twitter 1849132991164874848 6 Like on Twitter 1849132991164874848 2 Twitter 1849132991164874848
Load More

Contact us for more information!

Send us an email so that we can get back to you, as soon as possible.

Send Message
Find out more about consumer issues View Issues

Find us here

  • Case for Consumers
  • 1800 Diagonal Road, Suite 600 Alexandria, VA 22314
  • 703-718-5011
  • info@caseforconsumers.org
  • caseforconsumers.org

Fresh from our blog

  • DOJ Is Right: Spectrum Consolidation Hurts Americans
  • Nuclear Energy Victory: Trump and Republicans Secure America’s Energy Future
  • Rail Labor is No Friend of the Trump Innovation Agenda
  • CASE Op-Ed in DC Journal: Crime is Driving Inflation: Why Congress Must Act on Cargo Theft

© 2025 · Case for Consumers

  • Home
  • About
  • Issues
  • Contact
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms & Condition