• Home
  • About
  • Issues
    • Column 1
      • Energy
      • Healthcare
      • Taxes & Spending
      • Technology
      • Consumer Safety
    • Column 2
      • Agriculture
      • Trade
      • Government Regulation
      • Banking & Investmets
      • Intellectual Property
    • Column 3
      • Property Rights
      • Legal Reform
      • Higher Education
      • Right To Work
      • Retail & Online Commerce
  • Newsroom
  • Contact
info@caseforconsumers.org
Case for ConsumersCase for Consumers
Case for ConsumersCase for Consumers
  • Home
  • About
  • Issues
    • Column 1
      • Energy
      • Healthcare
      • Taxes & Spending
      • Technology
      • Consumer Safety
    • Column 2
      • Agriculture
      • Trade
      • Government Regulation
      • Banking & Investmets
      • Intellectual Property
    • Column 3
      • Property Rights
      • Legal Reform
      • Higher Education
      • Right To Work
      • Retail & Online Commerce
  • Newsroom
  • Contact

CASE Denounces BAT as Massive Tax Increase on America’s Working Families

CASE Denounces BAT as Massive Tax Increase on America’s Working Families

CASE Denounces BAT as Massive Tax Increase on America’s Working Families

July 19, 2017 Fiscal Policy, Taxes

CASE Denounces BAT as Massive Tax Increase on America’s Working Families

Today CASE, Consumer Action for a Strong Economy, issued the following statement in anticipation of this afternoon’s hearing by the House Committee on Ways and Means, Tax Policy Subcommittee, to consider “How Tax Reform Will Simplify our Broken Tax Code and Help Individuals and Families.”  Said CASE:

“Congress right now has the remarkable opportunity to reform our nation’s complex and broken 75,000 page tax code. Americans everywhere are hopeful that Washington will rise to the challenge and create reform that eliminates obstacles to economic growth and job creation, and lowers the burden paid by workers and businesses.

“To ensure this is accomplished, the first order of business must be for Congress to abandon any remaining attachment to a border adjustment tax (BAT), in any form or variation. A BAT would impose a massive 20% surcharge tax on the goods families buy every day, including food, apparel, energy, appliances, autos, tools and other items too numerous to mention. This is the very opposite of needed tax relief, and would render tens of millions of struggling Americans poorer. In fact a recent National Retail Federation study found the BAT will steal $1,700 per year from the budget of an average family of four.

“While it doesn’t require an extensive survey to understand that Americans would oppose paying 20% more for many of their daily purchases, a poll conducted by the Retail Industry Leadership Association nevertheless confirmed that Americans are solidly opposed to the BAT proposal. The fact that consumers would pay more in order to lower rates for corporations would further be a political disaster.

“Aside from the direct impact on consumers, the BAT would harm economic growth by making America’s exports more expensive, landing a blow to manufacturing jobs. The BAT would also cause a direct increase in the cost of insurance, harming local bond markets and real estate investment. From almost every angle, the BAT is a pickpocket, a job killer, and an economic growth stopper.

“Despite the American people and business leaders nationwide overwhelmingly rejecting the BAT, some in Washington still remain warm to the idea as a viable means to raise revenue. This is a mistake; including the BAT in any version will be the equivalent of pulling the pin on the grenade, killing any chance for meaningful tax reform once and for all.

“We welcome Congress looking at ways to help America’s families with a simpler tax code that lowers rates and unleashes the power of America’s economic engine. To truly help families, the first order of business must be to summarily and permanently reject the BAT as part of any tax reform plan. America’s families need tax relief, not a massive new tax on their everyday purchases courtesy of the BAT.”

Tags: BATtaxesWays & Means
Share
1

You also might be interested in

In The House of Representatives – Few Cures, Many Ills on Drug Pricing

In The House of Representatives – Few Cures, Many Ills on Drug Pricing

Sep 26, 2019

Yesterday, the House Energy and Commerce Committee debated the merits[...]

CASE Op-Ed – IJR: The US Economy Is Booming. Now the Government Just Needs to Stay Out of Its Way.

CASE Op-Ed – IJR: The US Economy Is Booming. Now the Government Just Needs to Stay Out of Its Way.

Sep 4, 2018

Gerard Scimeca – Chairman, CASE August 31, 2018 – https://bit.ly/2xYsfXy Seinfeld’s[...]

CASE Op-Ed: The GOP Tax Bill’s Hidden Consumer Tax

CASE Op-Ed: The GOP Tax Bill’s Hidden Consumer Tax

Dec 13, 2017

http://bit.ly/2C2BPII By Matthew Kandrach President, CASE December 13, 2017 With the[...]

Search

Categories

  • Aegis
  • Agriculture
  • Commerce
  • Communications
  • Consumer Safety
  • Crime
  • Data Privacy
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Energy
  • Entertainment
  • Environment
  • Financial Services
  • Fiscal Policy
  • Healthcare
  • Higher Ed on the Hill
  • Housing
  • Intellectual Property
  • Kentucky
  • Labor
  • Legal
  • Lifestyle
  • Manufacturing
  • Media
  • Regulation
  • Retail
  • Robotexts
  • Taxes
  • TCPA
  • Technology
  • Ticketmaster
  • Trade
  • Transportation
  • Uncategorized
  • Veterans

Archives

Contact Us

CASE Follow

Consumer Action for a Strong Economy - the Free Market Voice for America's Consumers; likes=bookmarks

CASE_forAmerica
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
23 Oct

.@POTUS’ IRA is driving up Part D premiums for millions of Medicare beneficiaries, yet Dems like @SenSanders continue to help tout this disastrous legislation. The Biden-Harris @WhiteHouse is misleading the public on their policy’s real impact.

Reply on Twitter 1849183731690409996 Retweet on Twitter 1849183731690409996 5 Like on Twitter 1849183731690409996 4 Twitter 1849183731690409996
Retweet on Twitter CASE Retweeted
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
23 Oct

Two weeks from election day, the supposedly independent @FCC is proposing price regulation of #broadband by restricting what data plans companies can offer.

By prohibiting usage-based plans, the FCC would end up increasing prices FOR EVERYONE, including low-data users!

Reply on Twitter 1849132991164874848 Retweet on Twitter 1849132991164874848 6 Like on Twitter 1849132991164874848 2 Twitter 1849132991164874848
Retweet on Twitter CASE Retweeted
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
21 Oct

CASE Letter Urges FDA & FTC to Scrutinize Deal Between L’Oréal and Galderma -- "Both companies are currently under investigation or facing sizable lawsuits from claims that they have used harmful chemicals in their products."
https://caseforconsumers.org/2024/10/21/case-letter-urges-fda-ftc-to-scrutinize-deal-between-loreal-and-galderma/

Reply on Twitter 1848386046033010802 Retweet on Twitter 1848386046033010802 4 Like on Twitter 1848386046033010802 2 Twitter 1848386046033010802
case_foramerica CASE @case_foramerica ·
23 Oct

Two weeks from election day, the supposedly independent @FCC is proposing price regulation of #broadband by restricting what data plans companies can offer.

By prohibiting usage-based plans, the FCC would end up increasing prices FOR EVERYONE, including low-data users!

Reply on Twitter 1849132991164874848 Retweet on Twitter 1849132991164874848 6 Like on Twitter 1849132991164874848 2 Twitter 1849132991164874848
Load More

Contact us for more information!

Send us an email so that we can get back to you, as soon as possible.

Send Message
Find out more about consumer issues View Issues

Find us here

  • Case for Consumers
  • 1800 Diagonal Road, Suite 600 Alexandria, VA 22314
  • 703-718-5011
  • info@caseforconsumers.org
  • caseforconsumers.org

Fresh from our blog

  • Nuclear Energy Victory: Trump and Republicans Secure America’s Energy Future
  • Rail Labor is No Friend of the Trump Innovation Agenda
  • CASE Op-Ed in DC Journal: Crime is Driving Inflation: Why Congress Must Act on Cargo Theft
  • Don’t Put Opportunity Zones on the Investment Sidelines

© 2025 · Case for Consumers

  • Home
  • About
  • Issues
  • Contact
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms & Condition
Prev Next